Your clipping is automatic
Your review queue is
still manual
Every auto-generated clip waits for a person to look at it before it can be published. That step is slowest during a live event — exactly when a clip is worth the most.
What changes when the queue stops forming
A clip comes out and somebody has to open it before it goes anywhere. None of what they check is hard to judge; all of it takes a person, one clip at a time. So the volume you can produce is not the volume you can publish — and the ceiling is your team's attention during exactly the hours content is worth most.
Every clip is checked against your rules the moment it exists, all checks at once. Most come back already decided, with the reason and the timecode attached. A person only opens the ones that genuinely need judgement, which is the work you hired them for.
"Just use AI for it" is a trap
Point a model at a clip and ask whether it is good, and you get an answer that sounds right and cannot be checked. Quality is not one thing: hidden inside "is this clip fine?" are three different questions, and each one wants a different kind of answer.
Most "quality" is just measurement
Reaching for a model first is how you end up paying model prices to answer questions a measurement already answers — and burning trust the first time it is confidently wrong.
Two ways to get it wrong
Under-tool and you miss real errors. Over-tool and you burn cost and trust. Each check goes to the smallest tool that is actually right for it.
Everything above is what this does. Below is what actually gets checked, and which parts arrive ready. See what gets checked
What actually gets checked
Your rules decide what "correct" means. The lanes and the routing arrive built.
Mechanical rules — measured, never judged
Duration and structure
Is the clip the length it should be, and does it start and end where it claims to?
Black frames and silence
The failures that are obvious to a person and trivial for a tool — which is exactly why a person should not be the one looking.
Audio levels
Loudness checked against the spec you publish to, such as EBU R128.
Look at the frame — vision, pointed at one question
Branding is present
The channel logo and the watermark are where they belong, on the frames where they belong.
Is this really the moment?
The clip claims to be a goal. A vision check confirms the frame agrees with the claim.
Right language, right feed
The kind of mismatch that only surfaces after publishing, when it is already somebody's complaint.
Judgement calls — kept with your team on purpose
Is this the best ninety seconds?
Editorial judgement, and the one thing worth your team's attention. The accelerator's job is to make sure it reaches them on few enough clips to be worth doing well.
The system never decides alone
An inconclusive result is routed to human review as a warning, rather than resolved into a guess.
Trust — the thing that decides whether it gets used at all
No verdict without evidence
Every answer carries the timecode and the measurement that produced it, or it does not count as an answer.
A rule you can argue with
When your team disagrees, they are looking at the same frame and the same number the check was. The conversation is about the rule.
Proven before it is trusted
A test set built by breaking real clips on purpose, so each check is shown to catch what it claims to catch.
A QC tool nobody believes is worse than no tool at all — people route around it, and you have paid for a step that changed nothing. Trust is the real currency here, and evidence is how it is earned.
What arrives built, and what stays yours
- Arrives built
- The orchestration that runs every check in parallel and assembles one answer, the check library of measurements and frame-level questions, the routing into pass, fail and human review, and structured output per category with timecodes.
- Built for you
- Your rule set — which logo, which levels, which languages, which durations — and the integration with where your clips are produced and where approved clips go next.
- Stays yours
- Your clipping or highlight generation, your publishing workflow, and editorial judgement on the clips that still reach a person.
The rules are the part nobody can hand you. Everything that runs them is already built.
How many clips are waiting on a person right now?
Tell us what your reviewers check before a clip goes out. We will show you how much of it is measurement.
Talk to us